Fifth Circuit· 3/28/2008

Hernandez v. Velasquez

Citations

522 F.3d 556
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6630
2008 WL 820999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a court of appeals “may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any grounds supported by the record and presented to the court below” (emphasis added)
holding that the plaintiff failed to show any indication that muscle atrophy, stiffness, loss of range of motion, and depression “posed a substantial risk of serious harm”
holding that a court of appeals “may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any grounds supported by the record and presented to the court below” (emphasis added)
concluding lockdown, to prevent gang-violence should be expected as an ordinary incidence of prison life
holding that 12 months in administrative lockdown was not atypical and significant
holding that 12 months in administrative lockdown was not atypical and significant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Wiener, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.