Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that when reviewing a motion for summary judgment, “the underlying facts and all inferences are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
• commenting that when reviewing a motion for summary judgment, \the underlying facts and all inferences are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party\
• stating that “‘[u]nsupported speculation is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.’ Felty v. Graves-Humphreys Co., 818 F.2d 1126, 1128 (4th Cir.1987).”
• “[i]n cases of substantial doubt, the safer course of action, is to deny the motion and proceed to trial”
• \Whether a contract is ambiguous is a legal question reviewable by this Court de novo.\
• \A nonmoving party need not come forward with evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial in order to avoid summary judgment.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).