West Virginia Supreme Court· 3/24/1995

Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.

Citations

459 S.E.2d 329
194 W. Va. 52
10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1449
1995 W. Va. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

commenting that when reviewing a motion for summary judgment, “the underlying facts and all inferences are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
commenting that when reviewing a motion for summary judgment, \the underlying facts and all inferences are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party\
stating that “‘[u]nsupported speculation is not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.’ Felty v. Graves-Humphreys Co., 818 F.2d 1126, 1128 (4th Cir.1987).”
“[i]n cases of substantial doubt, the safer course of action, is to deny the motion and proceed to trial”
\Whether a contract is ambiguous is a legal question reviewable by this Court de novo.\
\A nonmoving party need not come forward with evidence in a form that would be admissible at trial in order to avoid summary judgment.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cleckley, Workman, Brotherton, Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

436 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.