West Run Student Housing Associates, LLC v. Huntington National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts may not look outside the four corners of the amended complaint when resolving Rule 12(b)(6) motions
• holding that district courts may not look outside the four corners of the amended complaint when resolving Rule 12(b)(6) motions
• holding that facts in a complaint can be withdrawn by an amended complaint and cannot be used against plaintiff on a motion to dismiss unless repeated or incorporated in the new pleading
• holding the legal effect of an amended pleading is that it supersedes and nullifies the allegations made in the original pleading
• explaining that the District Court cannot look outside the four corners of the operative complaint at the motion to dismiss stage
• stating that “judicial admissions” alleged in prior complaint were no longer before court, because amended complaint, which became operative complaint, withdrew such admissions “by amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).