King v. Carey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The change in circumstances ‘must be significant or substantial.’ ” (quoting Jenkins v. Handel, 10 P.3d 586, 589 (Alaska 2000))
• first quoting Lee v. Cox, 790 P.2d 1359, 1361 (Alaska 1990); then quoting Jenkins v. Handel, 10 P.3d 586, 589 (Alaska 2000)
• “These allegations were raised for the first time in [mother’s] reply to [father’s] opposition to her motion to modify custody. They were therefore properly disregarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Mitchell v. Mitchell
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-03-18· cited 30×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Evans v. McTaggart
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-09· cited 77×
• Jenkins v. Handel
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-10-13· cited 75×
• C.R.B. v. C.C.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-05-29· cited 57×
• Lee v. Cox
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-04-27· cited 33×
• Demmert v. Kootznoowoo, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 19×
• Alaska State Employees Ass'n v. Alaska Public Employees Ass'n
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-06-21· cited 17×
• Cline v. Cline
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-30· cited 14×