Skip to main content
· 6/21/1991

Alaska State Employees Ass'n v. Alaska Public Employees Ass'n

Citations

  • 813 P.2d 669
  • 1991 Alas. LEXIS 56
  • 1991 WL 108444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ASEA’s position was not so devoid of merit as to justify the imposition of sanctions.”
  • “ASEA’s position was not so devoid of merit as to justify the imposition of sanctions.”
  • argument raised for the first time in reply memorandum could not be considered
  • argument raised for the first time in reply memorandum could not be considered
  • “[T]he court is expected to avoid using the wisdom of hindsight and should test the signer’s conduct by inquiring what was reasonable to believe at the time the pleading, motion, or other paper was submitted.” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (1983 amendment
  • “[T]he court is expected to avoid using the wisdom of hindsight and should test the signer’s conduct by inquiring what was reasonable to believe at the time the pleading, motion, or other paper was submitted.” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (1983 amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.