Alaska Supreme Court· 4/30/2004

Cline v. Cline

Citations

90 P.3d 147
2004 Alas. LEXIS 59
2004 WL 926063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding Rule 60(b)(4) “applies to attempts -14- 7802 Rule 60(b)(4
sustaining collateral attack on state court order that distributed more than 50 percent of military retirement benefits, in excess of federal statute that ‘‘established a limited grant of subject matter jurisdiction to state courts’’
sustaining collateral attack on state court order that distributed more than 50 percent of military retirement benefits, in excess of federal statute that \established a limited grant of subject matter jurisdiction to state courts\
past due installment required under property division became judgment when due and payable upon which post-judgment interest must be imposed
Civil Rule 60(b) may not be used as a substitute for a timely appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.