D. Oregon· 6/7/2002
King Ex Rel. King v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.
Citations
- 210 F. Supp. 2d 1201
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12821
- 2002 WL 1453829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The [Vaccine] Act does not prevent those * * * who have not sustained a ‘vaccine-related injury,’ such as a family member, from bringing a civil action in either state or federal court for compensation or psychological counseling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Ashmanskas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Greene v. WyethD. Nevada· 2004-10-29· cited 24×
- Shadie Ex Rel. Shadie v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-03-31· cited 18×
- Brooks v. Merck & Co., Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2006-07-31· cited 16×
- Oxendine v. Merck and Co., Inc.D. Maryland· 2002-12-18· cited 11×
- Oxendine v. Merck & Co.D. Maryland· 2002-12-18· cited 11×
- Bertrand Ex Rel. Bertrand v. Aventis Pasteur Laboratories, Inc.D. Arizona· 2002-09-23· cited 10×
- Troxclair v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-01-21· cited 6×
- Wax v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesFederal Claims· 2012-12-18· cited 3×
- Hobart v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-08· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 6,547×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationNinth Circuit· 1992-11-23· cited 4,522×
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 2,209×
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court· 1936-11-09· cited 2,167×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court· 1908-11-16· cited 1,832×
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedNinth Circuit· 1981-08-31· cited 782×
- Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaNinth Circuit· 2000-05-24· cited 739×
- Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-10· cited 621×
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dThird Circuit· 1992-10-23· cited 592×
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1998-04-03· cited 482×
- Samuel \Wesley\ McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Ninth Circuit· 1987-05-18· cited 459×
- United States v. Curtis J. Bernhardt, Michael F. McCarthy Harold T. Okahara, Jr., and Carl J. BernhardtNinth Circuit· 1988-04-08· cited 321×
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 217×
- Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1995-08-04· cited 202×
- Charlton v. Cortez Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 198×
- Jerome R. Lewis v. Time IncorporatedNinth Circuit· 1983-07-12· cited 195×
- Duncan v. StuetzleNinth Circuit· 1996-02-21· cited 169×
- Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.N.D. California· 2001-04-18· cited 110×
- Lewis v. Time Inc.E.D. California· 1979-09-14· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.