Charlton v. Cortez Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]umerous courts have found a market share of 30% or higher to be insufficient, by itself, to prove a dangerous probability of monopolization (citing cases)”
• “A subsequent failure to achieve monopoly status cannot itself vitiate a claim of attempted monopoly where other evidence substantially supports the attempt without eviscerating the entire attempt offense.”
• “It is now well established that any rule of reason analysis requires a showing of anti-competitive market effect. To hold otherwise would ignore the very purpose of the antitrust laws which were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.”
• collecting cases applying this principle to restrictive covenants
• noncompetition covenants ancillary to sale of business
• noncompetition covenants ancillary to sale of business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

165 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1996-12-13· cited 399×
• Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-07-12· cited 333×
• Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William Engle
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 306×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-09-13· cited 198×
• Ralph S. Weaver, Etc. v. Charles Henderson, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1993-01-21· cited 190×
• Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-05-11· cited 171×
• Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corporation
  First Circuit· 1988-12-30· cited 145×
• Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 142×
• White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-12-16· cited 113×
• Polk Bros., Inc. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 104×
• R. Anthony Marrese and Michael R. Treister v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-01-10· cited 96×
• Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-04-10· cited 89×
• Indiana Grocery, Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 88×
• General Industries Corp. v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-02-04· cited 84×
• M. Julia Dos Santos, M. D. v. Columbus-Cuneo-Cabrini Medical Center, Anesthesia Associates of Lakeshore, Ltd., and Alphonse Del Pizzo
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-08-10· cited 82×
• United States v. Baker Hughes Inc., Eimco Secoma, S.A., and Oy Tampella Ab
  D.C. Circuit· 1990-07-06· cited 80×
• Multiflex, Inc. v. Samuel Moore & Company, and Eaton Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-07-22· cited 79×
• Coleman v. Wilson
  E.D. California· 1995-09-13· cited 79×
• Richter Concrete Corporation, the Collinwood Shale Brick and Supply Company v. Hilltop Concrete Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1982-10-27· cited 77×
• Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T Corp
  Third Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 76×

Other cases named Charlton v. Cortez Development Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Charlton v. Cortez Development Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25