Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]ederal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the 19 right of removal in the first instance”
• holding that allegations based on “to the best of my knowledge and belief” are insufficient
• holding that a bald 7 recitation that damages exceeded the jurisdictional amount was insufficient to establish 8 the amount in controversy where the defendant did not set forth facts supporting that 9 assertion
• stating that “[f]ederal jurisdiction must be rejected if 14 there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance”
• noting that any doubt 20 as to the right of removal must be resolved in favor of remand
• holding 26 the plaintiff’s conclusory request for the jurisdictional requirement was insufficient 27 because the plaintiff “offered no facts whatsoever to support the court’s jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).