Kindhearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. Geithner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “special needs” exception did not apply to very similar facts
• holding that the “special needs” exception did not apply to very similar facts
• holding that the “special needs” exception did not apply to very similar facts
• holding that there is no general “reasonableness” approach to warrantless seizures
• noting that OFAC had provided “an unclassified three-page summary of the classified evidence” to the entity under investigation
• holding that there is no general “reasonableness” approach to warrantless seizures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).