Skip to main content
· 6/10/1993

Kincaid v. Mangum

Citations

  • 432 S.E.2d 74
  • 189 W. Va. 404
  • 1993 W. Va. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing this Court’s authority to reformulate questions certified to it by the circuit courts in order to fully address the law involved in the question
  • recognizing power of court to reformulate certified question to \address the law which is involved in the question\
  • recognizing power of court to reformulate certified question to “address the law which is involved in the question”
  • recognizing power of this Court to reformulate questions certified to it by the circuit courts of this State to fully address the law involved in the question
  • recognizing power of this Court to reformulate questions certified to it by the circuit courts of this State to fully address the law involved in the question
  • determining that omnibus bill may not be used to approve regulations from different state agencies but that, because Court’s decision was not clearly foreshadowed, application of its holding therein would be prospective only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.