Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not addressing the question whether the arbitration agreement in Marchio’s case is unenforceable for reasons other than public policy
• reversed on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, 132 S. Ct. 1201, 182 L. Ed. 2d 42 (2012)
• “‘One of the purposes of standardization is to eliminate bargaining over details of individual transactions. . . .’”
• reversed on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, 565 U.S. 530 (2012)
• reversed on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, 565 U.S. 530 (2012) (emphasis added). See also Geological Assessment & Leasing v. O’Hara, 236 W. Va. 381, 387, 780 S.E.2d 647, 653 (2015
• “With tendentious reasoning, the United States Supreme Court has stretched the application of the FAA from being a procedural statutory scheme effective only in the federal courts, to being a substantive law that preempts state law in both the federal and state courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).