Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

Keplinger v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

Citations

  • 537 S.E.2d 632
  • 208 W. Va. 11
  • 2000 W. Va. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party may not use. Rule 1-045 to subpoena records that are subject to an ongoing discovery dispute not resolved by the court
  • holding that a party may not use Rule 1-045 to subpoena records that are subject to an ongoing discovery dispute not resolved by the court
  • Subpoenas issued under Rule 45 are subject to scope of discovery set forth in Rule 26(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.