Khan v. Bakhsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a liquidated damages clause 23 awarding additional damages of “150% of actual damages” was an 24 unenforceable penalty for breach
• noting that \[t]he parol evidence rule generally bars extrinsic evidence regarding prior or contemporaneous agreements that are contrary to the terms of an integrated contract\
• \The parol evidence rule generally bars extrinsic evidence regarding prior or contemporaneous agreements that are contrary to the terms of an integrated contract.\
• invalidating liquidated damages seeking two- 2 and-a-half times actual damages
• invalidating liquidated damages seeking two- and-a-half times actual damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).