M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that parol evidence is admissible to ascertain the true intentions of parties to an ambiguous agreement
• holding that to prevail on a conversion claim, the plaintiff must have an exclusive right to possess the property
• holding that to prevail on a conversion claim, the plaintiff must have an exclusive right to possess the property
• holding that judgment as a matter of law is proper only when \the evidence is so overwhelming for one party that any other verdict would be contrary to the law\ (citations omitted)
• holding that a contractor’s license was property that can be converted
• providing that the district court’s application of the parol evidence rule is reviewed for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).