Edwards Industries, Inc. v. DTE/BTE, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court’s application of the statute of frauds is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
• stating that where there is both a promise to execute a written agreement and part 9 performance, “estoppel is properly invoked”
• noting that when reviewing a district court's decision to deny a motion for a new trial, \[the reviewing court] will not disturb that decision absent palpable abuse\
• noting that when reviewing a district court's decision to deny a motion for a new trial, \[the reviewing court] will not disturb that decision absent palpable abuse\
• stating that if the challenged issues would not have changed the outcome of the case, there is no violation of the party's substantial rights and thus no basis for granting a new trial
• noting that full performance can render the statute of frauds inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).