Lutz v. Gatlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To establish a lost instrument, the evidence must be clear, cogent and convincing”
• lost or unavailable personal guaranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Dowling
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-07-02· cited 69×
• Celmer, Elizabeth W. v. McGarry, Charles
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-08-08· cited 16×
• Khan v. Bakhsh
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-08-01· cited 11×
• Rubbelke v. Strecker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-12-19· cited 7×
• Strevell-Paterson Co., Inc. v. Francis
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-05-12· cited 7×
• Braut v. Tarabochia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-02-12· cited 6×
• Mitchell International Enterprises, Inc. v. Daly
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-10· cited 5×
• Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Replex Corp.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-05-27· cited 3×
• Crawford v. 733 San Mateo Company
  Third Circuit· 1988-08-17
• Estate of Brownfield v. Bank of America, NA
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lincoln v. Transamerica Investment Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-01-26· cited 37×
• Dahlgren v. Blomeen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-05-31· cited 24×
• Scurry v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1909-11-16· cited 19×
• Nelson v. Flagg
  Washington Supreme Court· 1897-10-19· cited 12×
• Johnson v. Wheeler
  Washington Supreme Court· 1952-10-02· cited 8×
• Deglow v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-10-16· cited 7×
• Tupper v. Hartman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1922-08-28· cited 3×