Crow-Spieker 23 v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parol evidence, so long as it is not inconsistent with the terms of the written contract, may be admitted to prove the existence of a separate oral agreement as to matters on which the written contract is silent
• holding that parol evidence, so long as it is not inconsistent with the terms of the written contract, may be admitted to prove the existence of a separate oral agreement as to matters on which the written contract is silent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).