United States v. Nathaniel Holt, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we ordinarily defer to the factfinder’s credibility determinations
• statement that was necessary to keep a co-conspirator abreast of the conspiracy's current status is in furtherance of the conspiracy
• liberal standard applied in determining whether statement is in furtherance of a conspiracy; statement need only have furthered interests of the conspiracy in some way including if statement could have been intended to affect future dealings between the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).