Skip to main content

Grier v. State

Citations

  • 869 S.E.2d 423
  • 313 Ga. 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under the second part of the plain error test, a defendant must point to an error that is “clear and not open to reasonable dispute” (cleaned up)
  • “Appellant has not met his burden under the plain error standard to show a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different, as the improperly admitted [testimony] was merely duplicative of other properly admitted evidence.”
  • “Appellant has not met his burden under the plain error standard to show a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different, as the improperly admitted [testimony] was merely duplicative of other properly admitted evidence.”
  • “Appellant has not met his burden under the plain error standard to show a rea- sonable probability that the outcome would have been different, as the improperly admitted [evidence] was merely duplicative of other properly admitted evidence.”
  • trial court clearly and obviously erred by failing to exclude an un-objected-to out-of- court statement, not because the statement was hearsay, but be- cause it violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.