Skip to main content

Kang v. State

Citations

  • 877 A.2d 173
  • 163 Md. App. 22
  • 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e may presume that criminal defendants represented by counsel have been informed of their constitutional rights,” including the right to a jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meredith, Moylan, Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.