S.D. New York· 3/24/2000
Kalnit v. Eichler
Citations
- 99 F. Supp. 2d 327
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4464
- 2000 WL 358379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The element of scienter is often the most difficult and controversial aspect of a securities fraud claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kalnit v. EichlerSecond Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 348×
- Crowell v. Ionics, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2004-11-03· cited 38×
- De La Fuente v. DCI Telecommunications, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-03-04· cited 31×
- In Re GeoPharma, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2006-01-27· cited 27×
- In Re GeoPharma, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-09-30· cited 23×
- Singh v. Cigna Corp.D. Connecticut· 2017-09-28· cited 8×
- MBL Contracting Corp. v. King World Productions, Inc.S.D. New York· 2000-06-01· cited 4×
- Baldwin v. KulchD. New Hampshire· 2000-09-29
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 639×
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 563×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert J. McNulty George G. Handgis, Franklin D. Roberts, John M. Shanklin and W.N. Thompson, John M. ShanklinSecond Circuit· 1998-03-03· cited 434×
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-03-13· cited 386×
- Cooper v. ParskySecond Circuit· 1998-04-02· cited 340×
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamSecond Circuit· 1999-04-05· cited 330×
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Second Circuit· 1978-01-03· cited 315×
- Susan R. Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., John R. Loomis and Joseph Stein, Jr., Individually and as Co-Partners of First Manhattan CompanyFirst Circuit· 1990-04-20· cited 284×
- Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-12-18· cited 273×
- Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-04· cited 265×
- Simon Debartolo Group, L.P., Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein v. The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc., and New England Development, Inc.Second Circuit· 1999-07-28· cited 158×
- Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.Second Circuit· 1999-09-23· cited 110×
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.S.D. New York· 2000-02-25· cited 88×
- De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Second Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 78×
- Mary MORLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIBA-GEIGY CORP., Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1995-09-13· cited 75×
- Atlantic Gypsum Co., Inc. v. Lloyds Intern. Corp.S.D. New York· 1990-12-20· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.