Kalnit v. Eichler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in dicta, that direc- tors alleged to have made misrepresentations “would be primary 23 violators rather than control persons”
• defendants alleged to be the sole primary violators \could not be control persons and section 20(a) does not apply.\
• “Although courts often refer to ‘conscious misbehavior’ or ‘recklessness,’ the terms appear to be legally interchangeable.”
• “Although courts often refer to ‘conscious misbehavior’ or ‘recklessness,” the terms appear to be legally interchangeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).