Skip to main content
· 11/3/2004

Crowell v. Ionics, Inc.

Citations

  • 343 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22254
  • 2004 WL 2475332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that an allegation that a specific defendant said “I want to go on the record stating it's not proper accounting—but it's nice to make money” during a specific meeting supported a strong inference of fraudulent intent
  • distinguishing a case in which the plaintiff lacked standing because he purchased stock before any false or misleading statement was made
  • finding a strong inference of scien-ter because, among other things, “[w]hat matters most to investors is income ..., and the restatement led to a downward revision of income” by 32.5%
  • “The way in which the allegedly fraudulent acts fit together and reinforce one another strongly suggests a conscious course of conduct.”
  • “The way in which the allegedly fraudulent acts [including fraudulent contract accounting and failure to maintain adequate internal controls] fit together and reinforce one another strongly suggests a conscious course of conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.