Skip to main content
· 3/13/1986

Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.

Citations

  • 506 A.2d 173
  • 66 A.L.R. 4th 157
  • 1986 Del. LEXIS 1053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that directors owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation and shareholders
  • “The duty of the board ... [is] the maximization of the company’s value at a sale for the stockholders’ benefit.”
  • “lock-ups and related agreements are permitted under Delaware law where their adoption is untainted by director interest or other breaches of fiduciary duty”
  • “A board may have regard for various constituencies in discharging its responsibilities, provided there are rationally related benefits accruing to the stockholders.”
  • “The duty of the board had thus changed from the preservation of Revlon as a corporate entity to the maximization of the company’s value at a sale for the stockholders’ benefit.... The whole question of defensive measures [thus] became moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNeilly, Moore, Balick, Del, Const, Art

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.