K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Murkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing Jefferson v. Asplund, 458 P.2d 995, and Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Porter and Jefferson, 469 P.2d 360 (Alaska 1970), as taxpayer standing actions
• supreme court has constitutional duty to review agency action even where such review is prohibited by statute
• review of constitutional challenge to administrative determinations, while of limited scope, is de novo
• this court reviews judgments below de novo to the extent that constitutional standards require
• this court reviews judgments below de novo to the extent that constitutional standards require
• findings not required where basis of decision clear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).