Alaska Supreme Court· 7/9/1976

Moore v. State

Citations

553 P.2d 8
6 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
56 Oil & Gas Rep. 1
1976 Alas. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that prosecution of plaintiffs’ claim was not inequitable when “[w]e fail to understand how defendants can ascribe . . . prejudice to plaintiffs’ ‘lack of diligence’ ”
holding that supreme court may affirm judgment on alternative grounds
applying substitution of judgment standard in determining whether AS 38.05.305 applied to oil and gas leases
\Standing questions are limited to whether the litigant is a 'proper party to request an adjudication of a particular issue '\
rejecting claim that appeal from non-adjudicatory agency action was not time-barred by predecessor to Appellate Rule 602
rejecting claim that appeal from non-adjudicatory agency action was not time-barred by predecessor to Appellate Rule 602

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, Burke, Dimond, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.