Trustees for Alaska v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party had standing even though more directly affected potential plaintiff could have sued because that potential party “ha[d] not sued nor [were] there any indications that he plan[ned] to do so”
• holding that party had standing even though more directly affected potential plaintiff could have sued because that potential party \ha[d] not sued nor [were] there any indications that he plan[ned] to do so\
• holding that citizen had standing to maintain action challenging state land leasing system
• holding that citizen had standing to maintain action challenging state land leasing system
• stating that we broadly interpret standing requirements because we favor increased accessibility to judicial fora
• granting citizen-taxpayer standing to a coalition of environmental, Native, and fishing groups challenging the States’s mineral leasing system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).