Skip to main content
· 5/21/1982

Eidelson v. Archer

Citations

  • 645 P.2d 171
  • 1982 Alas. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \[The exhaustion requirement has been dispensed with where the administrative remedy is inadequate ....\
  • noting that exhaustion of remedies rule promotes judicial economy by affording institutions opportunities to correct their own errors, so as to render judicial action unnecessary
  • establishing that failure to exhaust administrative remedies may be excused where the pursuit of the administrative remedy would be futile due to the certainty of an adverse decision
  • excusing failure to exhaust administrative remedies where pursuing those remedies “would be futile due to the certainty of an adverse decision”
  • applying exhaustion of administrative remedies to tort action for termination of doctor’s hospital privileges
  • hospital bylaws form “integral part of the contractual relationship” between doctor and hospital, and doctor must exhaust remedies provided therein before seeking judicial relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Compton, Connor, Dimond, Matthews, Rabinowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.