Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 8 S.W.3d 695
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 8961
  • 1999 WL 1080463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the search warrant was not an evidentiary warrant because it had been properly issued pursuant to article 18.02(9)
  • concluding that the search warrant was not an evidentiary warrant because it had been properly issued pursuant to article 18.02(9)
  • reversing a trial court’s grant of a motion to suppress because the search warrant to seize “1. Keltec 9mm pistol or any other 9mm pistols” was categorized as a subdivision 9 warrant rather than an evidentiary warrant
  • “ ‘plain view’ evidence may be properly seized with respect to searches authorized by warrants issued under subsections (1) through (9) and (12) of article 18.02”
  • “‘plain view’ evidence may be properly seized with respect to searches authorized by warrants issued under subsections (1) through (9) and (12) of article 18.02”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Livingston, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.