Sarabia v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the element of ‘intent 14 to arouse or gratify sexual desire’ cannot be inferred by concluding that the defendant committed the offense
• holding two contact sheets of photographs depicting underage boys engaged in sex was admissible to show defendant’s intent to arouse and gratify his sexual desires via underage boys
• photographs depicting activities with pre-teen boys in trial of aggravated sexual assault of child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).