Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/6/1991
Evans v. State
Citations
- 585 A.2d 204
- 322 Md. 24
- 1991 Md. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial judge not required to permit a qualified expert to express an opinion on any matter within the expert’s field
- trial judge not required to permit a qualified expert to express an opinion on any matter within the expert's field
- “The expert’s opinion is of no greater value than the soundness of the reasons given for it will warrant. If no adequate basis for the opinion is shown, the opinion should not be admitted or, if already admitted, should be stricken.”
- “The expert’s opinion is of no greater value than the soundness of the reasons given for it will warrant. If no adequate basis for the opinion is shown, the opinion should not be admitted or, if already admitted, should be stricken.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow, Eldridge, Jan, Karwacki, McAULIFFE, Murphy, Reargued, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-10· cited 275×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-09-12· cited 99×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-24· cited 66×
- Franch v. AnkneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-01-29· cited 37×
- Keene Corp. v. HallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-01· cited 17×
- Catler v. Arent Fox, LLPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-30· cited 16×
- City of Frederick v. ShankleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-01-31· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-07-26· cited 117×
- Bohnert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-07· cited 99×
- State Department of Health v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-05-04· cited 88×
- Strawderman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 57×
- Davis v. GoodsonSupreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 53×
- State v. WeatherfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-12-02· cited 38×
- State, Use of Stickley v. CritzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-12-17· cited 37×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-09-16· cited 36×
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-02· cited 28×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-09-21· cited 27×
- Tibbs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1910-06-01· cited 26×
- Fulcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1981-08-26· cited 24×
- Starr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-03-04· cited 16×
- People v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals· 1959-04-17· cited 15×
- McCracken v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-11· cited 12×
- Worthington Construction Corp. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-09· cited 12×
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-01-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.