Skip to main content

Evans v. State

Citations

  • 585 A.2d 204
  • 322 Md. 24
  • 1991 Md. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial judge not required to permit a qualified expert to express an opinion on any matter within the expert’s field
  • trial judge not required to permit a qualified expert to express an opinion on any matter within the expert's field
  • “The expert’s opinion is of no greater value than the soundness of the reasons given for it will warrant. If no adequate basis for the opinion is shown, the opinion should not be admitted or, if already admitted, should be stricken.”
  • “The expert’s opinion is of no greater value than the soundness of the reasons given for it will warrant. If no adequate basis for the opinion is shown, the opinion should not be admitted or, if already admitted, should be stricken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow, Eldridge, Jan, Karwacki, McAULIFFE, Murphy, Reargued, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.