Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/25/1998
Jones v. State
Citations
- 718 A.2d 222
- 351 Md. 264
- 1998 Md. LEXIS 739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]ny party judged to be a civil contemnor must be afforded the opportunity to show a present inability to purge the contempt”
- A showing that the failure to comply with the court order “was not an act of willful or contumacious non-compliance” is a defense in a civil contempt action
- a defendant in a civil contempt proceeding, if incarceration is sought, is entitled to the right to be represented by counsel and is entitled to appointed counsel if indigent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sickler v. SicklerNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-05-13· cited 180×
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 48×
- Rawlings v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-05· cited 40×
- In Re Blessen H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-11· cited 26×
- Dodson v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-05· cited 23×
- Zetty v. PiattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-16· cited 23×
- Fisher v. McCrary Crescent City, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-08· cited 18×
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-10-31· cited 10×
- In Re Blessen H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-30· cited 6×
- Redden v. Department of Social ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-13· cited 6×
- Kowalczyk v. BreslerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-02· cited 6×
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-01· cited 4×
- Stevens v. TokudaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-25· cited 4×
- (2001)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2001-08-03
- (1998)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 1998-11-24
- Breona C. v. Rodney D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-19
- Dept. of Health v. MyersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-02-29
- Sayed A. v. Susan A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-03-28
- Md. Dept. of Health v. BouldenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-06-03
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,242×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- In re NevittEighth Circuit· 1902-08-28· cited 325×
- Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 319×
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-17· cited 117×
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-05· cited 92×
- McCabe v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-06-15· cited 38×
- Middleton v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-16· cited 36×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-02-15· cited 34×
- McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-10· cited 30×
- Hersch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-07· cited 30×
- Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-10· cited 28×
- Elzey v. ElzeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-08· cited 26×
- Speckler v. SpecklerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-05· cited 25×
- Schwartzman v. SchwartzmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-01· cited 21×
- Herd v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-09-14· cited 16×
- Soldano v. SoldanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-08· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.