Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/10/1996
Lynch v. Lynch
Citations
- 677 A.2d 584
- 342 Md. 509
- 1996 Md. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Thus, notwithstanding that the proceedings are civil in nature, a defendant may be imprisoned for civil contempt.”
- “ ‘[A]n unintentional inability to pay precludes [a sanction] for either civil or criminal contempt’ ”
- Civil contempt “ ‘proceedings are generally remedial in nature and are intended to coerce future compliance’ ”
- before being incarcerated, a civil contemnor must have “the keys to the prison in his or her pocket,” that is, an opportunity to purge the contempt
- “[T]he goal of civil contempt proceedings, to coerce compliance with a court order entered primarily for the benefit of private parties to a suit, cannot be accomplished when the responsible party is [presently] unable, for whatever reason, to comply”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-07· cited 60×
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 48×
- Rawlings v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-05· cited 40×
- Goldberg v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-08· cited 37×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 32×
- Bryant v. Howard County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. CostleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-12· cited 29×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-19· cited 26×
- Dodson v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-05· cited 23×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-09-25· cited 22×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-29· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Zirkle v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 16×
- Bahena v. FosterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-16· cited 12×
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-10-31· cited 10×
- Guidash v. TomeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-06· cited 9×
- Rivera v. ZyskCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-08· cited 7×
- Schwartz v. WagnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-08-29· cited 6×
- Ott v. Frederick County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-22· cited 5×
- Stevens v. TokudaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-25· cited 4×
- Roe v. DoeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-07· cited 3×
- Poole v. Bureau of Support Enforcement Ex Rel. RoebuckCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-08-28· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- In re NevittEighth Circuit· 1902-08-28· cited 325×
- Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-29· cited 142×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of KingWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-23· cited 122×
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-17· cited 117×
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-05· cited 92×
- Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-01-26· cited 83×
- People v. RazatosSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-20· cited 43×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-02-15· cited 34×
- McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-10· cited 30×
- Winter v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-02-08· cited 29×
- Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-07· cited 26×
- Elzey v. ElzeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-08· cited 26×
- Speckler v. SpecklerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-05· cited 25×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-07· cited 23×
- Schwartzman v. SchwartzmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-01· cited 21×
- Herd v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-09-14· cited 16×
- Kerr v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-04-01· cited 14×
- Soldano v. SoldanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-08· cited 13×
- Russell v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.