Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 753 A.2d 587
  • 132 Md. App. 657
  • 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that brief quasi-public questioning while waiting for a witness to do a \show-up\ identification was not custodial interrogation under Mirando because it was similar to a traffic stop or a Terry investigative stop
  • discussing Berkemer and concluding that questioning during brief investigative stop on public street while potential eyewitness brought to scene not custodial for purposes of Miranda
  • distinguishing discovery violations under Rule 4-263 from Brady violations, the latter occurring when the State suppresses exculpatory evidence throughout the entire course of a trial
  • discussing Berkemer and concluding that questioning during brief investigative stop on public street while potential eyewitness brought to scene not custodial for purposes of Miranda
  • delineating discovery violations from Brady violations; the latter occurs when the State suppresses exculpatory evidence throughout the entire course of a trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Garrity, Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.