Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/3/2005
Adams v. State
Citations
- 885 A.2d 833
- 165 Md. App. 352
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Why [the witness] changed his position . . . is, of course, not controlling. It is the change itself that triggers the rule of Nance and of Rule 5-802.1(a).”
- “Why Leon Wilkerson changed his position between November 14 and May 21 is, of course, not controlling. It is the change itself that triggers the rule of Nance . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins, Sharer, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rowhouses, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-25· cited 39×
- Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-10-22· cited 12×
- In Re Matthew S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-01· cited 11×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-01· cited 6×
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-11-20· cited 6×
- Diallo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-04· cited 5×
- Wise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-11-24· cited 3×
- Wise v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-20· cited 3×
- Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-10-28
- State v. GraftonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-29
- Robichaud v. MacAskillSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-02-18
- Vanderpool v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-03-27
- Vanderpool v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-04-02
- State v. Santamaria-LandaverdeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-05-30
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
- Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court· 1957-11-12· cited 405×
- United States v. Eric C. PayneSecond Circuit· 1995-08-23· cited 229×
- United States v. Kevin Williams-DavisD.C. Circuit· 1996-09-20· cited 194×
- Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, Warden, Herman Charles Barnes v. Charles E. Thompson, WardenFourth Circuit· 1995-08-10· cited 187×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-24· cited 129×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-13· cited 112×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-13· cited 110×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.