· 1/3/2001
Argueta v. State
Citations
- 764 A.2d 863
- 136 Md. App. 273
- 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 3
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the test to be applied in determining whether express questioning constitutes an interrogation for Miranda purposes is whether the police officer should know that the questioning is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response
- holding that the test to be applied in determining whether express questioning constitutes an interrogation for Miranda purposes is whether the police officer should know that the questioning is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thieme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.