Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 753 So. 2d 1174
  • 1999 WL 254545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a juror-misconduct claim partly because \Jones had been informed that J.M. knew the victims and counsel could have explored during voir dire examination the basis of that knowledge\
  • “As asked, the question left room for subjective interpretations by the veniremembers. Therefore, we do not find that Juror J.M.’s failure to respond to this question constitutes juror misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

92 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.