Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 4/27/2012

Washington v. State

Citations

95 So. 3d 26
2012 WL 1450543
2012 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Washington's failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(10), resulted in his waiver of his argument on appeal
holding that Washington's failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(10) resulted in his waiver of his argument on appeal
holding that Washington's failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(10) resulted in a waiver of his argument on appeal
holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to hire an expert witness was insufficiently pleaded when Washington failed to set out the content of the expert's testimony
noting that defense counsel does not perform deficiently by \not present[ing] mitigation testimony during the penalty phase that could open the door to other damaging testimony\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Herself, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

157 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.