Aaron Lee Jones v. Richard Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmate was not entitled to a stay of execution because he waited four years after learning that the state intended to execute him by lethal injection to file his § 1983 challenge
• holding that inmate was not entitled to a stay of execution because he waited four years after learning that the state intended to execute him by lethal injection to file his § 1983 challenge
• holding that inmate was not entitled to a stay of execution because he waited four years after learning that the state intended to execute him by lethal injection to file his § 1983 challenge
• noting that Alabama also uses 3-drug protocol
• “We will not interfere with the State’s strong interest in enforcing its judgment in this case.”
• “[T]he Alabama Supreme Court is authorized to enter an order fixing an inmate’s date of execution ‘at the appropriate time.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).