Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 6/10/2016

Reeves v. State

Citations

226 So. 3d 711
2016 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37
2016 WL 3247447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that trial court was not required to adjust for Flynn effect given lack of scientific consensus supporting the theory
“This Court has repeatedly held that a circuit court is not required to accept, consider, or apply the ‘Flynn Effect’ in determining intellectual disability.”
“This Court has repeatedly held that a circuit court is not required to accept, consider, or apply the ‘Flynn Effect’ in determining intellectual disability.”
“This Court has repeatedly held that a circuit court is not required to accept, consider, or apply the ‘Flynn Effect’ in determining intellectual disability.”
“This Court has repeatedly held that a circuit court is not required to accept, consider, or apply the ‘Flynn Effect’ in determining intellectual disability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

124 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.