Kuenzel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a protestor was entitled judgment on the administrative record because the CO failed to give “primary consideration to the relative value and importance of the components of the procurement.”
• clarifying that Cavalier Clothes confirms this Court’s jurisdiction to review a denial of a COC
• loss of an opportunity to compete fairly for a contract may constitute “significant harm”
• The pre-award bid protestor “has a direct economic interest in being awarded this contract, based on the dollar amount at issue, and the fact that a new contract for these services may not be solicited for another seven years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).