Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 372 A.2d 1064
  • 280 Md. 282
  • 1977 Md. LEXIS 845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Court of Appeals need not decide whether defense counsel’s allegations of competency were sufficient because the trial judge regarded the statements as adequate for that purpose
  • concluding that the Court of Appeals need not decide whether defense counsel’s allegations of competency were sufficient because the trial judge regarded the statements as adequate for that purpose
  • finding that the failure to invoke proper statutory procedures designed to insure that the defendant not be tried if incompetent may result in the denial of a fair trial
  • finding that the failure to invoke proper statutory procedures designed to insure that the defendant not be tried if incompetent may result in the denial of a fair trial
  • finding that the failure to invoke proper statutory procedures designed to insure that the defendant not be tried if incompetent may result in the denial of a fair trial
  • finding that the failure to invoke proper statutory procedures designed to insure that the defendant not be tried if incompetent may result in the denial of a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine, Murphy, Siitauis, Smith, Dihres, Levin, Suparoei

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.