Sangster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no question that [parties] are entitled to rescission of the contract as an implied remedy under RISFA.”
• “Since CUTPA expressly permits the court to award ‘costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees based on the work reasonably performed by an attorney[,]’ the [counterclaim plaintiffs] are clearly entitled to such fees.” (citation omitted)
• court may not deny plaintiff undisputed right to litigate reasonableness of attorney’s fees
• plaintiff denied undisputed right to litigate reasonableness of attorney’s fees
• violation of RISFA also violated CUTPA
• violation of RISFA also violated CUTPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).