Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/8/2000
Roberts v. State
Citations
- 761 A.2d 885
- 361 Md. 346
- 2000 Md. LEXIS 684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘[A]n extensive proffer is not necessary–indeed, a defendant merely needs to . . . allege incompetence in order to trigger the need for a competency evaluation.’”
- “ ‘[A]n extensive proffer is not necessary — indeed, a defendant merely needs to ... allege incompetence in order to trigger the need for a competency evaluation.’ ”
- “Once the accused alleges incompetency to stand trial, a trial court is required to make a determination as to the accused’s competency to stand trial based on the evidence on the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holbrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-05· cited 53×
- Gregg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-10-16· cited 27×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-24· cited 18×
- Peaks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-26· cited 14×
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-19· cited 14×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-05-30· cited 10×
- Sibug v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25· cited 7×
- Wood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-21· cited 7×
- Kennedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-21· cited 6×
- Sibug v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-02· cited 3×
- Stewart-Bey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-07-31
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-15· cited 588×
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-26· cited 257×
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 162×
- Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-17· cited 149×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-08· cited 107×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-17· cited 93×
- Mauzy v. HornbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-05-03· cited 90×
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-26· cited 84×
- Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-09· cited 75×
- Romm v. FlaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-05· cited 74×
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-07· cited 71×
- Thanos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-05· cited 64×
- Treece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-11· cited 61×
- Stanford v. Maryland Police Training & Correctional CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-28· cited 59×
- Strawderman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 57×
- Raithel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-05· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.