Skip to main content
· 10/7/1974

Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. Frank

Citations

  • 325 A.2d 718
  • 272 Md. 528
  • 1974 Md. LEXIS 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a lack of penalty, though not controlling, suggested that statute was directory
  • agreeing that, in disbarment proceedings against attorney, “‘the primary purpose is not to punish an offender; it is protect the public against members of the bar who are unworthy of the trust and confidence essential to the relationship of the attorney and client’ ”
  • Principles of double jeopardy and res judicata which bar certain criminal prosecutions are not a bar to disciplinary proceedings against an attorney.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.