Skip to main content

Wood v. State

Citations

  • 750 So. 2d 592
  • 1999 WL 334750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that future claims traditionally recognized by a writ of error coram nobis shall be raised through a rule 3.850 motion
  • holding that defendants adjudicated prior to the opinion would have two years in which to raise claims traditionally cognizable in error coram nobis
  • holding that “both custodial and noncustodial movants” may seek relief under rule 3.850
  • permitting a writ of error coram nobis where petitioners asserted they were not informed that deportation was a possible consequence of their pleas
  • noting similarity between the relief to be obtained under the writ and under rule 3.850
  • limiting claims cognizable under coram nobis to the time limit in rule 3.850

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

163 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.