Richardson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that coram nobis is not available to persons in custody
• noting how rule 3.850 has effectively absorbed most claims that could be brought under either habeas corpus or error coram nobis
• \all newly discovered evidence claims must be brought in a motion pursuant to Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.850\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
• Wood v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-27· cited 170×
• State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 94×
• Scott v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-23· cited 58×
• Peart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-18· cited 47×
• Bates v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-21· cited 35×
• Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 34×
• Brantley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 23×
• Bartz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-01· cited 20×
• Malcolm v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-29· cited 19×
• Wood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-11· cited 15×
• Howarth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-24· cited 15×
• Steinhorst v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-05-26· cited 11×
• Amendments To Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 10×
• Flint v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-01· cited 9×
• Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-02· cited 9×
• Dugart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-17· cited 8×
• In Re Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-21· cited 6×
• Lemus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-21· cited 5×
• Neely v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-27· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Furman v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
• Hallman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-03-15· cited 137×
• Russ v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-06-07· cited 74×
• Roy v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1963-04-10· cited 67×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-25· cited 55×
• State v. Matera
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-07-12· cited 44×
• State v. Bolyea
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 37×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-04-21· cited 28×
• Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-11-30· cited 27×
• Dequesada v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-01· cited 6×