Skip to main content

Daker v. State

Citations

  • 300 Ga. 74
  • 792 S.E.2d 382
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that enumeration of error not supported by citations to record was abandoned
  • describing the conditions under which a “trial court must refer the motion [to recuse] to another judge” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • declining to address an enumeration of error when the appellant provided no cogent legal argument to support it
  • on appeal, “[i]t is the burden of the complaining party, including pro se appellants, to compile a complete record of what happened at the trial level” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • listing the claims raised in Daker’s original direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.