Skip to main content

Redding v. State

Citations

  • 296 Ga. 471
  • 769 S.E.2d 67
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly curtailed his cross-examination of a state’s witness about potential bias was without merit, in part because the defendant offered no evidence to support the basis for the alleged bias
  • “[S]light differences in the size, shading, or clarity of photographs used in an identification lineup will not render the lineup impermissibly suggestive.”
  • defendant’s photograph “had a plain white background while the other photographs had identical gray backgrounds”
  • defendant’s photograph “had a plain white background while the other photographs had identical gray backgrounds”
  • no plain error in directing jury to rely on previous instructions, as “[w]e have never held . . . that the court must engage in a question and answer session with the jury or instruct the jurors individually on how to apply the law to the facts” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.